Showing posts with label liberty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liberty. Show all posts

Monday, June 15, 2009

iran

What is happening right now in Iran may be the most important event in the world since 9/11, and perhaps it could have more long lasting effects than anything since the fall of the Berlin Wall. No other country in the world poses as large a threat to peace and stability than an Iran that is run by the mullahs. They are a few short years away from obtaining a nuclear weapon, and their current President has on numerous occasions claimed that the Holocaust was a hoax. Does anyone really think that someone like that won't use a weapon of mass destruction against Israel if he has the chance? This could be a defining moment in the history of the modern world, and it is time for the strength of the free world to stand up for democracy and show that the tyranny of the past will no longer be tolerated.

For thousands of years the large majority of humans have been dominated and controlled by a ruling elite. It is only over the past 200 years or so have the ideals of freedom, liberty, and personal autonomy spread among people around the world. And by no means have these freedoms reached the lives of many of the people around the globe. Unfortunately, billions of people still suffer from the harsh realities of totalitarian regimes where their liberty and freedom of choice are extremely limited; however, there is hope. The digital age has ushered in many new ways information can be transmitted and allowed many new forms of communication. This proliferation of information has spread to the masses the ideas of freedom, equality and liberty that have directly lead to the great advances of the past two centuries. It is no coincidence that the countries that have achieved the greatest advances and provided the highest standard of living for their citizens are also the countries that have allowed their citizens to retain the most personal liberties.

Over the past week hundreds of thousands of Iranians, mostly young students and women, have sought to end decades of intolerance, brutality and injustice and stand up for their right to collectively decide how they should be allowed to live their lives. It is imperative that people all of the world who believe in freedom support their cause. Sham elections like the one that just occurred in Iran cannot be tolerated, and people have taken to the streets to stand up against tyranny. The words of Joseph Stalin are as true today as when he said them fifty years ago: "The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything." Below is a picture of some of the protests in Tehran, were an estimated 120,000 people came out on Monday.


It is time for President Obama to stand up for what is right, and to show the world that the United States is dedicated to protecting liberty and democracy both at home and abroad. Ronald Reagan's presidency showed what the power of an America committed to the ideals that made this country can great can accomplish. The Soviet Empire was more powerful and a greater threat than Iran, and without firing a shot we were able to topple the regime simply by promoting ideals that all free humans would consider indispensable. By supporting the pro-democracy supporters in Iran, Obama could send the message that the U.S. still stands for freedom and all that is good in the world. We can only hope that the mullahs are not allowed to simply circumvent the will of the Iranian people, unfortunately though, I think that is what is going to happen. I just hope that historians far in the future don't look back at this day as one of greatest missed chances for securing a new era of peace and prosperity around the world.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

specter and everything else that is wrong with the gop

As I'm sure most of you have heard, my Senator from the state of Pennsylvania, Arlen Specter, has decided to defect from the Republican Party.  Specter has stated that the reason for leaving was because the Republican Party has moved too far right while he has remained true to his moderate record.  That's some of the biggest bullshit I've heard in a long time.  First, Specter's move is a purely political one.  He's a lifetime politician, the scourge of the country.  He realized that Pat Toomey, who unsuccessfully ran for Specter's seat in the 2004 Republican primary, was leading him by 21 points in polls among likely Republican voters in 2010, and that he wasn't going to be renominated as the Republican candidate for Senate in the next election cycle.  He then made a deal with Democrats that he would caucus with them as long as they didn't put up a Democratic challenger in 2010.  Some ideological struggle indeed.  

Although this looks like a major defeat for the GOP, and it is in many respects, I think this could be a turning point for the party if they use this defection to begin moving in a better direction.  Many pundits are claiming that this is a huge loss because Democrats will now have a filibuster proof majority in the Senate.  In reality, Specter was already going to vote with the Democrats on many issues, so his switching party affiliations really didn't get them any more votes.  The real test of whether the Democrats can prevent a filibuster will come from moderate Democrats in traditionally Republican states like Kent Conrad of North Dakota, Evan Bayh of Indiana, and Ben Nelson of Nebraska.  Their votes on issues like cap-and-trade will determine whether it will become law because Specter was already going to vote with the Democrats.

Specter claimed that the Republican party has been moving too far right for his tastes.  Doubtful.  Republicans have abandoned the principles upon which the Reagan revolution was founded: belief in restraining government spending, pro-growth policies, tax reduction, sound national defense, and maximum individual liberty. First, when it comes to personal freedom as well as personal responsibility issues,  Republicans have betrayed their roots of classical liberal ideology.  In our current political environment, the question always seems to be, "How can the federal government fix the problem?"  If this is the question that is being debated in Washington, then Republicans are always going to lose.  Democrats are the party of government run solutions, and instead of offering a watered-down democratic solution, the Republican party needs to articulate free market and private solutions to the issues facing us as a nation.  

More than anyone, former President Bush is the most to blame for this destruction in fundamental ideology.  Far too often he caved to political pressures and rather than attempting to fundamentally reform government expenditures.  He expanded the size of government through programs like Medicare Reform, No Child Left Behind, and other federal economic regulation.  During Bush's term in office, the  Federal Registry, which contains the rules and laws for federal regulation of all types of industries, grew from 64,438 new pages in 2001 to 78,090 in new pages in 2007, a record amount of regulation. Economically significant regulations, defined as regulations which cost more than $100 million a year, increased by 70%.  Spending on regulation increased by 62% from $26.4 billion to $42.7 billion.  Now that's what I call a limited government voting record.

Not to mention a relatively new wing of the Republican party, the Christian Conservative, has come to dominate the GOP agenda.  Southern Republicans, who gain most of their political support from deeply religious conservatives, has caused the party to move away from a belief in limited government and personal freedom.  Instead of supporting individual rights, the GOP has demonized ethnic, racial and political minorities, believing that supporting the Christian conservative agenda is more important than protecting individual rights.  This has caused groups like gays, hispanics, african americans and jews to feel alienated from the party, preventing the GOP from winning even small minority support.  Until the GOP fundamentally restructures their view of how the government should be run, and what the appropriate role of the government should be, they will continue to lose support nationwide.

So what should the GOP do?  I am glad you asked.  Below are 5 points I believe would fundamentally overhaul the party and could make them into a majority party once again.  Not to  mention it will begin moving America back in the direction of freedom and prosperity.
  1. Explain why government is not the solution.
    Government spending is wasteful.  Everyone knows it.  We can't let the the government pick economic winners and losers in America because it is only going to lead to entrenched bureaucracies with no objective other than attempting to force the government to continue giving them funding.  The deficits we are running are unsustainable, will lead to rampant inflation, and will destroy the financial system beyond repair.

  2. Begin offering free market solutions to today's economic problems.
    Republicans are not articulating why Obama's policies are going to bankrupt America in the long term.  They need to stress that free market solutions are inherently more economically efficient than government spending programs, and that prosperity will be maximized, especially in the poorest classes, when government allows entrepreneurs to create new opportunities.  This sounds like a win-win, but they must also stress that free market solutions means allowing bad investments to fail.  In other words, no more bailouts for failing companies like the domestic auto industry.  Failures of these companies, although painful in the short term, create tremendous opportunities for new economic growth in the long term as new suppliers will emerge to meet the newly found surplus in demand created by the fall in supply.

  3. Support individual rights and liberties.
    The federal government should have no role in deciding who should be allowed to get married, and Republicans need to recommit themselves to protecting individual liberties all all costs.  Rights belong to individuals, not groups, and that is the message they should stress.  By strengthening individual rights, they can meet two important goals: preventing future government encroachment of personal freedoms (including economic freedoms), and opening up the party to traditionally democratic voters like gays, pro-choice moderate women, and other minority groups who believe strongly in personal rights.  

  4. Stress the importance of the citizen politician.
    Now this might just be a pipe dream of mine, but I think it could be a winning issue for Republicans.  They should push for term limits in both houses of Congress.  My recommendation would be you can be re-elected into the house three times (four terms totaling eight years), and as many times as you wished in the Senate, but you cannot run for re-election in the term directly after you served.  By rededicating themselves to the idea of citizen politicians, a notion strongly supported by the founding fathers, we can eliminate lifetime politicians, thereby limiting the control of special interests.  If politicians are not constantly running for re-election, there is no incentive for them to constantly raise money, greatly reducing the influence of special interest groups.  Unfortunately this is not going to happen.  Too many Republicans themselves are career politicians to support such a matter. 

  5. Explain that Americans are not getting what they are paying for.
    The U.S. budget this year is in the trillions of dollars.  Many Americans are paying between 30-60% of the income in taxes of some kind, be it federal income tax, state income tax, local wage taxes, state sales taxes, etc.  In some cases, that is the equivalent of working Monday through Friday and only getting paid for working Monday and Tuesday.  And for what?  With the massive government spending, Very few people see any concrete benefits that come anywhere near the tremendous amount they put into the system.  These high tax rates destroy the incentive to work hard, not to mention they are fundamentally unfair.  Republicans should emphasize that when a government grows to the size ours has currently achieved, it is unable to effectively govern in an efficient way.  We essentially work half the time to support ourselves, and half the time to support the government.
Now I don't kid myself into thinking this is the path the GOP will follow.  Unfortunately I think they are in too deep at this point, and it is going to take a major economic collapse (and if you think the current recession is bad just wait until will have major negative economic growth coupled with skyrocketing inflation from unfunded debt - 2008-09 will look like rosy economic times) to overhaul the system.  Hopefully I'm wrong.  We are going down a path that will bankrupt the country.  Additionally we are taking away both economic and personal freedoms in the name of protecting the common good.  One of my favorite quotes is from Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis who in his dissenting opinion in Olmstead v. United States stated, "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."